Family disputes often involve continuing relationships and children’s interests, even when the parties disagree sharply. Mediation can provide a structured setting for discussing issues that the law permits them to settle. It is not a shortcut for privately changing civil status or avoiding a needed court order.

The Supreme Court’s Rule on Family Mediation

The Supreme Court approved A.M. No. 24-02-06-SC, the Rule on Family Mediation. Its official explanation describes mediation as a process facilitated by an impartial mediator to help parties reach voluntary agreements. It identifies matters that may be mediated, including support, custody, visitation, property relations and certain intestate-estate disputes, where a compromise is legally permissible.

The Rule also has exclusions. Issues such as the validity of a marriage, civil status, future support and certain protection-order cases are not matters the parties can simply compromise. Some proceedings may have both non-compromisable and potentially mediable aspects. A lawyer should identify that distinction before the parties sign any proposed agreement.

Prepare for a useful discussion

Bring the relevant orders, agreements, financial records and a concise list of issues. Where children are involved, frame proposals around their needs and practical arrangements rather than using mediation as a contest over blame. The Supreme Court’s explanation notes confidentiality protections and restrictions on recording, but parties should still seek advice about the particular process and any proposed terms.

Cedeño Law Office advises on family law matters. If you have received a court notice or are considering an agreement, contact the firm for a case-specific assessment.

General information only. This article does not determine whether a particular case must or may be mediated.